Filtering & prioritization
Interpretation starts from a shortlist, not from millions of raw calls. Two layers of filtering produce that shortlist.
Workflow-level filtering (already applied)
Before a case reaches the Interpreter, the analysis workflow has already:
Removed common variants by applying a population-frequency cap. Variants more common than the cap in reference populations (e.g. gnomAD) are filtered out, on the principle that a variant common in the general population is unlikely to cause a rare disease.
Annotated the remaining variants with gene, consequence, frequency, and clinical significance.
Case-level filtering (you control)
Within the Interpreter, each variant tab has its own filter drawer. Every variant list shares a User Classification filter (Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, VUS, Likely Benign, Benign); the rest vary by variant type:
Small variants: User Classification, Gene, Chromosome, Position.
Structural variants: User Classification, Automated Classification, Gene, SV Type (DEL, INS, DUP, BND, INV), Chromosome, Position.
Copy number: User Classification, Type (DEL, DUP), Gene, Chromosome, Copy Number, Position.
Tandem repeats: User Classification, Chromosome, Position, LPS Outlier.
Paralogs: no filters.
Two tabs open with a filter already applied: Structural Variants is pre-filtered to Automated Classification = Pathogenic and Likely Pathogenic, and Tandem Repeats is pre-filtered to LPS Outlier. Clear or adjust these if you want to see the full list.
How to use filters well
Start from the phenotype: apply a relevant gene panel or HPO-driven prioritization if available.
Tighten on rarity and predicted impact to surface the strongest candidates.
Loosen deliberately if the strong candidates don't explain the phenotype. Keep a record of what you relaxed.
A frequency cap that is too strict can hide a real but slightly-more-common variant. If a case is unsolved, revisit the frequency threshold before concluding.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

